I have come to see many zoos I've visited as necessary evils. The Catoctin Wildlife Preserve and Zoo in Thurmont, Maryland, however, isn't necessary at all. Federal or state authorities should shut it down. If government can't, the people of Maryland should: Let's boycott the place and enable capitalism to provide the punishment it deserves -- taking some animals out of their misery in the process.
The zoo's marketing is detached from reality. Catoctin claims that it is "one of the finest zoos in Maryland." Brother, if that's true, we need to launch an immediate investigation into not just Catoctin but into every zoo in the state.
Spend a day there, as I did on May 28 with three friends, and you will see a nightmare in broad daylight. We all came away convinced that the Catoctin Wildlife Preserve and Zoo is more of a prison than a preserve.
We spent our time in the zoo and I focus my comments on it. We did not take the safari ride to see what we hope is a more open preserve side of the establishment because we were too depressed to linger any longer. Endangered Sun Bears from Southeast Asia that are supposed to live in tropical rainforest habitat paced back and forth in a dry, dusty prison cell on dirt. A tiger sat in solitary confinement. A mountain lion limped across its outdoor cell. Deer, llamas and goats all begged for the food visitors brought them. It was amusing at first, pathetic upon further reflection.
"The zoo does not respect the animals here," Tomoko MataHari Miura told me as we toured the place last Saturday. "Many are poorly treated. It's an unhealthy environment for the animals and the space is definitely too small for them." She knows a little something about wildlife -- serving as a manager for the Japan Bear and Forest Society.
No part of the zoo wreaked of more desperation than the home for animals labeled as "wolves" -- my favorite animal in all the kingdom and one whose beautiful howl I've heard bellow out across the Alaskan outback. The four wolves sentenced to live out there lives here were skeletons beneath tufts of fur. The pack animals whose destiny is to roam wide open spaces could only race in frantic circles inside their cage. They looked like they were losing their minds.
I don't claim to be an animal whisperer and none of the animals at Catoctin sent me a text message but I know that if I were them, I'd want somebody to take me out of my misery. My own father has long told me if he ends up in that sorry of a state, I have to promise to take him deep sea fishing and come back alone.
Catoctin is managed by the Global Wildlife Trust, a charity that now runs the facility. The trust takes in a little more than $1 million a year on average from ticket sales, memberships and other sources, according its 2009 tax return Form 990. (If the link doesn't work, visit Guidestar, register for a free account, and then put Global Wildlife Trust in the search box.) The husband-and-wife tandem of Richard and Mary Anne Hahn serve as president and secretary/treasurer, respectively, and they certainly don't appear to operate the site to get rich. Their trust paid them less than $60,00 combined. Daughter Laurie Hahn serves on the board of directors but receives no compensation. Neither does board president Carole Brown.
What then is the motive for operating such a heart-breaking operation?
Catoctin claims the trust's mission "is dedicated to broadening human understanding of the animal world."
That's typically where I begrudgingly add the word "necessary" before "evil" when I refer to a zoo. My idealism wants to believe that zoos -- especially well-managed facilities -- give children a chance to see animals they could otherwise only experience by computer screen or television. I hope they are infused with wonder and develop a sense of connection to all things wild that leads to forming a conservation ethic -- which in turns propels them to fight for wildlife protection. Great zoos can pull that off while simultaneously providing a respectful, humane habitat for the wildlife they house.
Catoctin Wildlife Preserve pays but lip service to that idea on zoo front, falsely boasting that it achieves its mission through "immersion in naturalistic habitat recreations and educational programs using live animals and instructional tools both on-site ... and through presentations to the greater community."
There is not much natural in this zoo.
I have no reason to doubt the intention of the Hahn family. I've not met them but I can only imagine that they are good, hard-working people who likely should be applauded for their intent -- but not for their execution. I've worked for nonprofits for the past 11 years and know that a kind heart doesn't always equate to professional competence.
Someone attempting to justify the zoo's operations might point to the zoo's "credentials" page on its Web site. There you'll find a long string of organizations and acronyms that appear at first glance to give Catoctin all the paperwork it needs. The zoo proudly states it's an accredited member of the Zoological Association of America and that it is licensed by a wide variety of governmental authorities including the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Inspection Services; U.S. Department of Interior's Animal, Fish and Wildlife Division; U.S. Department of Natural Resources of Maryland.
If the Catoctin zoo gets a passing grade from those authorities, this fact should serve as an indictment against the entire zoological industry and the federal agencies responsible for overseeing it. Let's reform this system post haste.
I have no idea if the preserve side is any better than what I saw and I can't bare another visit to find out. The zoo, though, should be closed immediately. No animal should be forced to suffer like that. No government agency should condone it, no Maryland tourism entity should promote and no citizen should pay to see it.
[Photos courtesy of Won-ok Kim].
Hey, it's Tomoko. Thank you so much for taking us out the other day.
Zoo... Yeah, I can see their effort, but they, well like many do, get it all wrong, I think. No life is above or below or less or more valuable. Simple imagination. If the wolves in the cage are your sister and brother, will you allow them to be treated like that? All lives are equally important and are connected in such a fine network. We must respect that in order to be respected back. =D
Anyhow, thank you for your great hospitality and we hope to see you sometime soon!
Much love & gratitude,
Posted by: MataHari Amano | May 30, 2011 at 10:40 PM
I think that the more people learn about these awful places, the more they realize something MUST be done. The State of Maryland should step in here before matters get worse.
Thanks for sharing/
Posted by: jennifer | May 31, 2011 at 01:45 PM
It was very uncomfortable to see especially big wild animals like wolves, lions, and bears locked up within such small space. They all clearly looked mentally very sick. Wolves were circling around the same place again and again and lions kept howling as if they were expressing their pains. Sometimes torturing could be worse than killing and this makes me feel human beings are so selfish and cruel.
I imagine every zoo must have challenges on space. I believe whoever operates truly love animals and would like to give people with more opportunities to experience the animal world. However, the good intent cannot justify the outcome of harming animals. Unless you have enough (at least reasonable size of) space to carry them, you should not have them locked up there. Think about what kind of message this can give to your children. It's okay to abuse animals as long as it entertains human beings?
Posted by: Wonok Kim | May 31, 2011 at 02:22 PM
Thank you for this insightful post. Wow, this is really terrible. I agree having this zoo around does not seem to be helping anyone.
Posted by: Jose Dominguez | June 01, 2011 at 04:34 PM
You're a fucking idiot. you don't know shit about that zoo so don't open you're big fat mouth and say such degrading shit.
Posted by: Jane | March 26, 2012 at 05:52 PM
I went there with my kids and quite enjoyed it. It is true, they are a small zoo with limited space. they are more like the zoos of the last century where few animals are afforded large natural habitat enclosures. That said, the enclosures aren't that much different than The National Zoo. Get off your high horse!
Posted by: Andrew Stewart | June 01, 2012 at 04:29 AM
I have visited the zoo over many years and have taken kindergarten classes there, as well. The zoo continues to grow and improve each year. Our family joined with a membership so we can go more often and enjoy it. The natural habitat of the whole area of the park makes a lovely setting to spend the day. The animals are in clean areas and are well cared for. I would like to see improvement for some animals; the wolves, mountain lion and the Sun bear, for examples need larger habitats to be more comfortable but it will take more funding, which I am supporting. I believe the writer does believe in zoos at all but as a teacher I value the accessibility to real animals. Oh, by the way, the deer, goats and other animals that beg for food ENJOY being fed. If you think they were demanding you should visit the koi pool where they will jump out of the water to have a treat, this isn't a sign of abuse. Your point of view is slanted and you should make it clear that NO zoo would be acceptable.
Posted by: Candace | August 03, 2012 at 06:12 PM
Great posting! Thanks for making aware of this zoo and animals situation.
Posted by: Animal Safari | October 17, 2012 at 02:33 AM
I'm reading about $12,000 fines to this zoo and it makes me sad. The best facility in North America that I've seen is the Wild Animal Park in San Diego North County, CA. It's massive and every animal has so much space. If the animals are malnourished and living in poor habitats, then we need to send them to better zoos and shut the substandard ones down. I will avoid this zoo for sure. It sounds like a homing ground for circus animals (talk about another industry of animal abuse that needs to stop!)
Posted by: Kate W | October 18, 2012 at 11:57 AM
I just visited this zoo and found it quite shabby in some areas, with small enclosures, as others have said, for the sun bears. There's absolutely no stimulation for the bears, who are accustomed to climbing. And the tiny area for the constantly pacing wolves was indeed heartbreaking. Other areas are better. I'd rather see them have fewer animals and more space for the ones they have, instead of trying to fit so many species in as they are now. I'm sure the owners mean well and are struggling financially. I just hope they can improve conditions for the animals.
Posted by: Kay | October 22, 2012 at 11:39 AM
"I have no reason to doubt the intention of the Hahn family."
I DO. Quite a few years ago I sent Richard Hahn a letter of concern regarding the conditions of the breeding parrots. They had tiny cages, absolutely no toys or other stimulating objects, and inadequate diet.
At the time I wrote the letter I hoped that whomever ran this place actually cared about animals and would remedy the situation now that they knew about it. No such luck!
Instead, Mr. Hahn wrote back a letter full of defensiveness and lies. It was clear he had no concern for the welfare of Catoctin Zoo's animals, but only for covering his own behind. I was disgusted and never visited again. I am saddened but not surprised to read about the fines because of poor treatment of animals here. :-(
Posted by: Cynthia | January 28, 2013 at 07:46 AM
Great! I am glad that you share this post and make aware of such things.
Posted by: Zoo Management | April 02, 2013 at 02:36 AM
And the Hahn family continues on and on with their lies. "to preserve, protect, educate" They tell us for years that the small wolf exhibit is but a temporary one, not intended as their permanent home. This same exhibit which allowed the wolves to dig through, get hold of the leg of a semi-crippled mountain lion and chew it to the point the lion had to be put down. Yes, the public got to witness this as well. They tell us that the wolves are all brothers and sisters, "from the same litter." But, they are fixed as "no responsible zoo would allow brothers and sisters to breed." Well, this year, two of the sisters had wolf pups sired by a brother. They have been put on exhibit. There are pictures on Facebook of them. And some are being sent to other zoos. Wonder if they (the other zoos) know the pup's true breeding? Yes, Catoctin Zoo is outstanding, outstanding in the lengths it will go to take advantage of their animals for profit while not providing them the care they deserve!
Posted by: Martin | June 10, 2013 at 10:39 PM
I had family visiting us and wanted to do something fun and different . We decided to go to the zoo . We almost didn't go after reading all the neg comments . However we did and we were all so glad we did . It was clean and everything was easy to see . Bathrooms were well maintained bldgs also . I am already looking forward to going back again in the spring . Thank you for a wonderful day that we will remember .
Posted by: C Sonnak | September 09, 2013 at 12:58 PM
I don't think clean bathrooms quite make up for the miserable way Catoctin Wildlife Preserve & Zoo treats the animals there.
Posted by: Chris | September 09, 2013 at 01:15 PM